{"currentpage":1,"firstResult":0,"maxresult":10,"pagecode":5,"pageindex":{"endPagecode":5,"startPagecode":1},"records":[{"abstractinfo":"根据国内钢铁生产的特点,定义了综合相对环境指数IREI,并在此基础上建立了钢铁生产环境负荷评价的累积对比模型.将该模型应用到国内几种典型的钢铁生产流程评价中,结果表明,评价结果具有可对比性,可以定量化;与高炉-转炉流程相比,直接还原铁的IREI值为0.615,电炉流程吨粗钢的IREI值分别为0.513(特钢),具有较明显的环境优势;此外,以废钢为原料的电炉钢普钢流程的环境负荷也明显小于高炉-转炉流程,其吨粗钢IREI值为0.504.","authors":[{"authorName":"周和敏","id":"376f4872-0576-4fb3-a787-8354af9b35f0","originalAuthorName":"周和敏"},{"authorName":"高怀","id":"fedf2053-786c-4589-985f-4fb9fde15cae","originalAuthorName":"高怀"},{"authorName":"李贵奇","id":"ef37095d-c02f-4c06-899c-404d1a24b4ed","originalAuthorName":"李贵奇"}],"doi":"","fpage":"64","id":"91d4fd2c-0519-4743-bf3a-e9c9f659860e","issue":"2","journal":{"abbrevTitle":"GT","coverImgSrc":"journal/img/cover/GT.jpg","id":"27","issnPpub":"0449-749X","publisherId":"GT","title":"钢铁"},"keywords":[{"id":"1d8dfc3c-bd47-4839-8c23-da4f90f2a61c","keyword":"累积对比模型","originalKeyword":"累积对比模型"},{"id":"c6853f0e-da7c-4b03-8f49-20f8829baa0b","keyword":"环境当量系数","originalKeyword":"环境当量系数"},{"id":"e7fb55ff-ef4e-4b51-a9eb-7e20aed138ba","keyword":"综合相对环境指数","originalKeyword":"综合相对环境指数"},{"id":"2a92a867-dab6-4cc4-8c99-a08c232d41ce","keyword":"钢铁生产流程","originalKeyword":"钢铁生产流程"},{"id":"55a4b3aa-f9cd-442b-b31b-b97243695bea","keyword":"生命周期评价","originalKeyword":"生命周期评价"}],"language":"zh","publisherId":"gt200202018","title":"钢铁生产环境负荷的累积对比分析评价","volume":"37","year":"2002"},{"abstractinfo":"选用六种常用或最新的多轴累积损伤模型,对不同种类阶梯谱下的LY12CZ铝合金试验数据进行损伤计算,统计了各模型总损伤计算值的准确率.统计结果表明,对于LY12CZ铝合金,六种模型在不同谱型下对两级阶梯谱的寿命预测能力有一定差别;没有一种累积损伤模型能同时对所有类型的两级阶梯谱具有最好的计算结果.","authors":[{"authorName":"夏天翔","id":"39d5ad4e-dc83-4a1d-8e59-44a00a876882","originalAuthorName":"夏天翔"},{"authorName":"姚卫星","id":"f99570a2-d085-4d92-b790-cf4c20d421c9","originalAuthorName":"姚卫星"},{"authorName":"许力蒲","id":"1275d8c6-e27d-4687-b31d-d007e582821a","originalAuthorName":"许力蒲"}],"doi":"10.11868/j.issn.1005-5053.2014.3.014","fpage":"86","id":"d7655cbb-36fe-45db-9001-5b7546d4728c","issue":"3","journal":{"abbrevTitle":"HKCLXB","coverImgSrc":"journal/img/cover/HKCLXB.jpg","id":"41","issnPpub":"1005-5053","publisherId":"HKCLXB","title":"航空材料学报"},"keywords":[{"id":"975a0f4f-fafc-4273-8fea-2019de20d022","keyword":"多轴疲劳","originalKeyword":"多轴疲劳"},{"id":"44b376a7-1528-4202-afae-89c893c6bd71","keyword":"LY12CZ铝合金","originalKeyword":"LY12CZ铝合金"},{"id":"50788093-6f84-4131-b18f-109e5b255b36","keyword":"载荷谱分类","originalKeyword":"载荷谱分类"},{"id":"2659bb31-0954-4959-b6a6-918f996b02c3","keyword":"两级阶梯谱","originalKeyword":"两级阶梯谱"},{"id":"241869e7-6f57-44e8-abfa-4339dbdf45e5","keyword":"累积损伤理论","originalKeyword":"累积损伤理论"}],"language":"zh","publisherId":"hkclxb201403014","title":"LY12CZ铝合金在多轴两级阶梯谱下疲劳累积损伤理论的对比研究","volume":"34","year":"2014"},{"abstractinfo":"建立了三维累积损伤有限元模型,采用扩展拉格朗日乘子法对螺栓表面和复合材料层合板孔壁间的接触行为进行了模拟.对复合材料层合板中纤维断裂、基体开裂和纤维-基体剪切3类基本损伤类型的产生、扩展以及它们之间的关联性进行了研究.计算得到了复合材料层合板单钉连接结构的载荷-位移曲线,预测了它们的初始挤压破坏载荷.同时,进行了T300帘子布/QY8911双马来酰亚胺树脂层合板单钉单搭螺栓挤压强度试验,验证了不同铺层类型和结构尺寸对复合材料层合板机械连接挤压性能的影响.试验结果和计算结果吻合较好,证明了该模型和算法的有效性.","authors":[{"authorName":"张爽","id":"85d1a203-b529-4c4e-9e83-db543e5b5c36","originalAuthorName":"张爽"},{"authorName":"王栋","id":"4066dde3-0109-4d51-9c90-5c00f082de0f","originalAuthorName":"王栋"},{"authorName":"郦正能","id":"e3027712-5183-4a2d-a7ab-ead39c8d3ab1","originalAuthorName":"郦正能"},{"authorName":"寇长河","id":"47c403be-4301-474e-a2dc-545e154fe401","originalAuthorName":"寇长河"},{"authorName":"章怡宁","id":"4578b258-fa5d-4e75-a1c3-ff8303578bb8","originalAuthorName":"章怡宁"}],"doi":"10.3321/j.issn:1000-3851.2006.02.028","fpage":"163","id":"cb81041f-f7a9-4380-aff3-2fb0cc334ca4","issue":"2","journal":{"abbrevTitle":"FHCLXB","coverImgSrc":"journal/img/cover/FHCLXB.jpg","id":"26","issnPpub":"1000-3851","publisherId":"FHCLXB","title":"复合材料学报"},"keywords":[{"id":"24d7dc3e-4a9a-45f5-8646-4bd881c15507","keyword":"层合板","originalKeyword":"层合板"},{"id":"9ca7e812-5f5e-449f-829e-666641e7f30f","keyword":"机械连接","originalKeyword":"机械连接"},{"id":"fca4e0ea-3c73-4869-a973-5d15561b17e6","keyword":"累积损伤","originalKeyword":"累积损伤"},{"id":"890619df-6010-461e-ae77-697294a69c47","keyword":"接触模型","originalKeyword":"接触模型"}],"language":"zh","publisherId":"fhclxb200602028","title":"复合材料层合板机械连接结构累积损伤模型和挤压性能试验研究","volume":"23","year":"2006"},{"abstractinfo":"为详细比较动态增厚火焰模型和火焰锋面密度模型的性能,本文分别采用这两种亚网格燃烧模型对工业燃气轮机PRECCINSTA的模型燃烧室内湍流预昆火焰进行了大涡模拟研究.计算结果与实验数据吻合良好,且这两种模型预测得到的速度、温度和主要组分的统计数据也非常接近.然而对于CO的分布两者的预测结果差异明显,文中对此进行了简要分析.研究还表明本文的计算结果与实验数据的吻合度与文献中报道的前期结果相比有所提高.","authors":[{"authorName":"王平","id":"a52ed0f7-f9ef-41ce-860b-aea1d623ac79","originalAuthorName":"王平"},{"authorName":"陆少杰","id":"9fcee40f-37e6-4936-a7aa-a19d528b5d18","originalAuthorName":"陆少杰"}],"doi":"","fpage":"2526","id":"5deeb426-f53a-45be-8c99-1bd6b17fdd62","issue":"12","journal":{"abbrevTitle":"GCRWLXB","coverImgSrc":"journal/img/cover/GCRWLXB.jpg","id":"32","issnPpub":"0253-231X","publisherId":"GCRWLXB","title":"工程热物理学报 "},"keywords":[{"id":"f0653965-a17e-48b6-b5cb-0de399f266c5","keyword":"大涡模拟","originalKeyword":"大涡模拟"},{"id":"b7fe63ba-c66c-4902-86d1-a8f41385d455","keyword":"旋转火焰","originalKeyword":"旋转火焰"},{"id":"8d8618e0-270c-4f39-83e6-559ac4938f1f","keyword":"动态增厚火焰模型","originalKeyword":"动态增厚火焰模型"},{"id":"0b41ba13-6374-4804-9131-6f6aeae67feb","keyword":"火焰锋面密度模型","originalKeyword":"火焰锋面密度模型"},{"id":"44362ff7-b8a7-485a-aaeb-f1622155e8ff","keyword":"燃气轮机","originalKeyword":"燃气轮机"}],"language":"zh","publisherId":"gcrwlxb201412044","title":"两种亚网格燃烧模型的对比研究","volume":"35","year":"2014"},{"abstractinfo":"对比研究了六个常用的湍流模型预测压气机转子叶尖复杂旋涡流动的能力,选用的六个湍流模型分别为,混合长度模型,SA模型,标准κ-ε模型,SSTκ-ω模型,v2-f模型和雷诺应力模型.通过与压气机转子尖区典型的大尺度旋涡结构-泄漏涡和角区旋涡的SPIV详细测量结果的对比,分析了六个湍流模型预测转子尖区复杂流动的能力;在结合试验的基础上,根据数值模拟结果对转子尖区流动进行了更为深入的分析.","authors":[{"authorName":"柳阳威","id":"6d1e93cd-5511-4485-b850-9775bf920ea6","originalAuthorName":"柳阳威"},{"authorName":"刘宝杰","id":"cef015b6-300b-49b8-bea2-083d6ca7d8ae","originalAuthorName":"刘宝杰"}],"doi":"","fpage":"399","id":"d6659eca-1976-4ae5-a673-8c6bf68d7d12","issue":"3","journal":{"abbrevTitle":"GCRWLXB","coverImgSrc":"journal/img/cover/GCRWLXB.jpg","id":"32","issnPpub":"0253-231X","publisherId":"GCRWLXB","title":"工程热物理学报 "},"keywords":[{"id":"823aa58e-a00e-4e4d-8fd1-7c2230deb88a","keyword":"泄漏涡","originalKeyword":"泄漏涡"},{"id":"67a40b97-ec31-42e9-9222-da9e13b2b806","keyword":"角区旋涡","originalKeyword":"角区旋涡"},{"id":"2b262fc0-7632-4450-afb8-c00ecfc0f87d","keyword":"压气机","originalKeyword":"压气机"},{"id":"8397f2bb-4a16-4886-929c-e8b90faf5b8b","keyword":"湍流模型","originalKeyword":"湍流模型"},{"id":"9ee28f02-d03a-4895-93ba-785d8588954b","keyword":"数值模拟","originalKeyword":"数值模拟"}],"language":"zh","publisherId":"gcrwlxb200803010","title":"湍流模型在压气机转子尖区流动模拟中的对比研究","volume":"29","year":"2008"},{"abstractinfo":"本文根据碳粒非均相着火,有无颗粒温度跃变现象,来判断CO的均相着火,阐述了MFF模型中颗粒边界层CO着火燃烧假设的理论意义.通过实验与理论对比,证明了小于100μm的碳粒有可能发生CO着火.MFF模型预报与连续膜模型,以及实验点都有好的符合.利用MFF模型推导出三种极限情况的燃烧模式,揭示了MFF模型与连续膜模型的理论关联.从理论与实验对比中,进一步地验证了MFF模型.","authors":[{"authorName":"张健","id":"581fc8dd-5b11-432b-ac75-47eab6fc8679","originalAuthorName":"张健"},{"authorName":"章明川","id":"41fafc69-0717-4841-ab6b-edbc1cfdb2f9","originalAuthorName":"章明川"},{"authorName":"于娟","id":"362a098d-e537-47c2-9725-270062d2a1a1","originalAuthorName":"于娟"},{"authorName":"齐永锋","id":"22e93fec-3e1e-4435-9abf-c38419856a9d","originalAuthorName":"齐永锋"},{"authorName":"林郁郁","id":"e6b96be0-e81a-485f-978f-7d1381146765","originalAuthorName":"林郁郁"}],"doi":"","fpage":"157","id":"942a911c-9e59-4dc2-b379-4434b45dd004","issue":"1","journal":{"abbrevTitle":"GCRWLXB","coverImgSrc":"journal/img/cover/GCRWLXB.jpg","id":"32","issnPpub":"0253-231X","publisherId":"GCRWLXB","title":"工程热物理学报 "},"keywords":[{"id":"1ba6015b-1512-47e1-b62f-0a75f3d9c3ae","keyword":"移动火焰锋面模型","originalKeyword":"移动火焰锋面模型"},{"id":"bf435e88-44ac-4722-8fdf-2f1a0f0a5961","keyword":"颗粒边界层CO着火","originalKeyword":"颗粒边界层CO着火"},{"id":"a2a71a47-a9b4-4b90-b81d-df941468798d","keyword":"连续膜模型","originalKeyword":"连续膜模型"}],"language":"zh","publisherId":"gcrwlxb201001044","title":"移动火焰锋面(MFF)模型的理论对比与实验验证","volume":"31","year":"2010"},{"abstractinfo":"基于不同等离子简化模型,对比研究了5 kV电压下等离子诱导流场.结果表明,由于假定电荷分布依赖于电势分布,模型一导致体积力过大,诱导流场速度最大达6 m/s;模型二中内外电场叠加并根据实验拟合壁面电荷分布,最大诱导速度仅为1 m/s,与实验结果接近;而模型三由于不易选取合理的电场强度分布线性化参数,最大诱导速度达7 m/s,也与实验结果相差较大.","authors":[{"authorName":"陈浮","id":"b99dcea0-b07e-4019-b70c-289779702753","originalAuthorName":"陈浮"},{"authorName":"刘华坪","id":"5746a57d-c07e-4ca7-b9c4-6f6c724a0f86","originalAuthorName":"刘华坪"},{"authorName":"袁继来","id":"e2fa0d96-10ea-4316-aabb-355b4bafa6a7","originalAuthorName":"袁继来"}],"doi":"","fpage":"1113","id":"366effe8-0bec-4058-a2b3-9853c352585e","issue":"7","journal":{"abbrevTitle":"GCRWLXB","coverImgSrc":"journal/img/cover/GCRWLXB.jpg","id":"32","issnPpub":"0253-231X","publisherId":"GCRWLXB","title":"工程热物理学报 "},"keywords":[{"id":"5ff7de84-31d6-44fa-83f7-fe0b7fca5c13","keyword":"等离子","originalKeyword":"等离子"},{"id":"da3ae756-0e67-4035-917b-1c263d0bd7b7","keyword":"简化模型","originalKeyword":"简化模型"},{"id":"9c50207a-c24c-468b-8e7a-ee4cc35b8c07","keyword":"诱导流动","originalKeyword":"诱导流动"}],"language":"zh","publisherId":"gcrwlxb200907009","title":"不同等离子体积力模型诱导流动对比研究","volume":"30","year":"2009"},{"abstractinfo":"基于TC4合金的应变率和温度相关单轴应力-应变曲线试验数据,优化估计了Johnson-Cook、修正Zerilli-Armstrong和Bammann黏塑性三种动态本构模型的材料参数,对比分析了三种本构模型对TC4单轴变形试验数据的描述能力.结果表明:在TC4变形试验参数范围内,Bammann黏塑性模型可以较好地描述TC4合金的应变率和温度相关变形行为;Johnson-Cook模型和修正Zerilli-Armstrong模型的单轴应力-应变曲线计算结果比较接近,但与试验数据的相关性相对较差,均不能如实反映TC4室温动态压缩试验的应变率敏感性.","authors":[{"authorName":"胡绪腾","id":"1a1e79b4-ba10-421e-8888-cf1674ba8273","originalAuthorName":"胡绪腾"},{"authorName":"宋迎东","id":"16d8df11-4d1b-4d36-ac90-beea1775716d","originalAuthorName":"宋迎东"}],"doi":"","fpage":"32","id":"a80bdd0b-7fca-4e9a-aad5-77deacf3c996","issue":"1","journal":{"abbrevTitle":"BQCLKXYGC","coverImgSrc":"journal/img/cover/BQCLKXYGC.jpg","id":"4","issnPpub":"1004-244X","publisherId":"BQCLKXYGC","title":"兵器材料科学与工程 "},"keywords":[{"id":"f64a550a-8709-4bf6-9bfd-773fdc71ac68","keyword":"钛合金","originalKeyword":"钛合金"},{"id":"c268462a-aabf-48fa-bcd8-cce127b70a86","keyword":"动态行为","originalKeyword":"动态行为"},{"id":"17f9ebc3-f2dc-4bbc-a7bf-f4273cb2029f","keyword":"应变率相关","originalKeyword":"应变率相关"},{"id":"642ba8f2-8261-4eea-ba0e-4ec369f87a76","keyword":"本构模型","originalKeyword":"本构模型"}],"language":"zh","publisherId":"bqclkxygc201301010","title":"TC4钛合金三种动态本构模型的对比分析","volume":"36","year":"2013"},{"abstractinfo":"基于时间增量原理,推导了层合板接头疲劳加载累积损伤应力-应变分析的虚功方程.同时,引入Hashin三维疲劳失效准则进行材料的损伤判定,并结合建立的疲劳加载材料退化模型、4种基本损伤机制相互关联作用的材料性能退化方法及复合材料接头最终失效判据,建立了层合板接头疲劳载荷作用下三维累积损伤分析的寿命预测方法.最后,对层合板接头拉-拉疲劳载荷作用下的损伤累积扩展与失效规律进行了仿真分析,并与试验结果进行了对比,结果表明:本文中建立的寿命预测方法能够很好地预测层合板接头的寿命以及损伤发生、扩展及最终失效.","authors":[{"authorName":"王丹勇","id":"f74ef8b2-1fdb-4fcd-8e4b-2bc52bcab4e3","originalAuthorName":"王丹勇"},{"authorName":"温卫东","id":"91f8c27c-aeda-4d8f-b1fd-9de3f2f37add","originalAuthorName":"温卫东"}],"doi":"10.3321/j.issn:1000-3851.2008.01.029","fpage":"173","id":"0b1ffc86-9d08-42b8-9b61-6e7b76d84a58","issue":"1","journal":{"abbrevTitle":"FHCLXB","coverImgSrc":"journal/img/cover/FHCLXB.jpg","id":"26","issnPpub":"1000-3851","publisherId":"FHCLXB","title":"复合材料学报"},"keywords":[{"id":"8c1f7029-8c54-42c2-b835-8bd0bcb74ecb","keyword":"复合材料","originalKeyword":"复合材料"},{"id":"16bc3e6b-b3e3-4fe9-8a2f-356e0310aec3","keyword":"接头","originalKeyword":"接头"},{"id":"e43d0a7f-74f2-4d4d-911f-5bbae186ea34","keyword":"疲劳","originalKeyword":"疲劳"},{"id":"620eb88c-8120-4480-8f3c-170304ca1a1d","keyword":"累积损伤","originalKeyword":"累积损伤"}],"language":"zh","publisherId":"fhclxb200801029","title":"复合材料单钉接头疲劳累积损伤破坏分析","volume":"25","year":"2008"},{"abstractinfo":"集总参数模型建模简单,计算量小,但其精度低,不能较好地反映回热加热器的动态特性.因此,本文采用分布参数模型、嵌套模型、链式模型、分段集总模型等方法对回热加热器各工况进行仿真研究,主要包括入口焓扰动、入口流量扰动和入口热流量扰动.结果表明:链式模型精度最高;而通过优化分段数的分段集总模型能够改进集总参数法的不足;选择合适的代表点可改进集总参数模型的精度.","authors":[{"authorName":"陈二燕","id":"afd2e6f9-34c4-4132-94eb-055922ba948b","originalAuthorName":"陈二燕"},{"authorName":"邢秦安","id":"b11b0d55-b8f7-4e81-82b0-0ae870d3a607","originalAuthorName":"邢秦安"},{"authorName":"刘继平","id":"1a14952c-fff0-4434-a3a9-99d2d79a73df","originalAuthorName":"刘继平"}],"doi":"","fpage":"1335","id":"f8f34cea-3dac-4f76-8113-38633a896a76","issue":"7","journal":{"abbrevTitle":"GCRWLXB","coverImgSrc":"journal/img/cover/GCRWLXB.jpg","id":"32","issnPpub":"0253-231X","publisherId":"GCRWLXB","title":"工程热物理学报 "},"keywords":[{"id":"cdcb54e6-d4b4-4d8f-9123-ce542dde0bc6","keyword":"仿真","originalKeyword":"仿真"},{"id":"7fce101f-5775-49f5-b91a-b21077e1f3f8","keyword":"回热加热器","originalKeyword":"回热加热器"},{"id":"27ac003a-5c9b-42d9-a0b6-8deb5206a1c7","keyword":"集总模型","originalKeyword":"集总模型"},{"id":"d81ca4f5-1318-4ea6-bd34-35958d7df18b","keyword":"动态精度","originalKeyword":"动态精度"}],"language":"zh","publisherId":"gcrwlxb201307033","title":"回热加热器动态模型计算精度的对比研究","volume":"34","year":"2013"}],"totalpage":2702,"totalrecord":27017}