欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

The objective of the present investigation is to analyze the influence of profile of blast furnace on the burden motion and stress field through 3D-DEM (three-dimensional discrete element method). It is clarified that the decrease of shaft angle speeds up the velocity of burden descending and decreases normal stress between particles or particle and wall. This change is good for the smooth operation of blast furnace. However, ore and coke would be mixed for the too small shaft angle (75~) , which would influence the permeability in blast furnace. Thus, the appro- priate shaft angle is around 80°. Decrease of bosh angle prevents the burden descending motion and increases normal stress between particles and bosh wall. Meanwhile, maximum normal stress acting on the wall moves from belly wall to bosh wall in the case of 68° bosh angle, which accelerates abrasion of refractory in bosh by friction force between particles and wall. Although burden descends smoothly in the case of 88° bosh angle, room is not enough for the as- cending heated gas flow. Thus, the appropriate bosh angle is about 78°.

参考文献

[1] XIANG Zhong-yong;WANG Xiao-liu.Design of Blast Furnace Theory and Practice for Ironmaking Process[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2009
[2] Takanobu INADA;Kouzo TAKATA;Kouji TAKATANI;Takaiku YAMAMOTO .Effect of Blast Furnace Profile on Inner Furnace States[J].ISIJ International,2003(7):1003-1010.
[3] Takanobu INADA;Kouji TAKATANI;Kouzo TAKATA .The Effect of the Change of Furnace Profile with the Increase in Furnace Volume on Operation[J].ISIJ International,2003(8):1143-1150.
[4] Cundall P A;Straek O D L .A Discrete Numerical Model for Granular Assemblies[J].Géotechnique,1979,29(01):47.
[5] Sun-Young KIM;Yasushi SASAKI .Simulation of Effect of Pore Structure on Coke Strength Using 3-dimensional Discrete Element Method[J].ISIJ International,2010(6):813-821.
[6] Ramos Maximiano V;Kasai Eiki;Kano Junya et al.Numeri eal Simulation Model of the Iron Ore Sintering Process Directly Describing the Agglomeration Phenomenon of Granules in the Packed Bed[J].ISIJ International,2000,40(05):448.
[7] Umekage Toshihiko;Kadowaki Masatomo;Yuu Shinichi .Nu tactical Simulation of Effect of Tuyere Angle and Wall Scaffolding on Unsteady Gas and Particle Flows Including Raceway in Blast Furnace[J].ISIJ International,2007,47(05):659.
[8] H. KAWAI;H. TAKAHASHI .Solid Behavior In Shaft And Deadman In a Cold Model of Blast Furnace with Floating-Sinking Motion of Hearth Packed Bed Studied by Experimental and Numerical Dem Analyses[J].ISIJ International,2004(7):1140-1149.
[9] FAN Zheng-yun;Natsui Shungo;Ueda Shigeru et al.Transient Behavior of Burden Descending and Influence of Cohesive Zone Shape on Solid Flow and Stress Distribution in Blast Furnace by Discrete Element Method[(Continued on Page 11)[J].ISIJ International,2010,50(07):946.
[10] Natsui Shungo;Ueda Shigeru;FAN Zheng-yun et al.Sensitivity Analysis of Physical Parameters in Discrete Element Method Compared With Blast Furnace Cold Model Experiments[J].Tetsu To Hagane-Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan,2010,96(01):1.
[11] Shungo NATSUI;Shigeru UEDA;Masashi OIKAWA .Optimization of Physical Parameters of Discrete Element Method for Blast Furnace and Its Application to the Analysis on Solid Motion around Raceway[J].ISIJ International,2009(9):1308-1315.
[12] Shigeru UEDA;Shungo NATSUI;Zhengyun FAN;Hiroshi NOGAMI;Rikio SODA;Junya KANO;Ryo INOUE;Tatsuro ARIYAMA .Influences of Physical Properties of Particle in Discrete Element Method on Descending Phenomena and Stress Distribution in Blast Furnace[J].ISIJ International,2010(7):981-986.
[13] Shimizu Masakata;Yamaguchi Arata;Inaba Shin-ichi et al.Dynamics of Burden Materials and Gas Flow in the Blast Furnace[J].Tetsu To Hagane-Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan,1982,68(08):936.
[14] Taihei NOUCHI;Takeshi SATO;Michitaka SATO .Stress field and solid flow analysis of coke packed bed in blast furnace based on DEM[J].ISIJ International,2005(10):1426-1432.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%