选用人工唾液、去离子水和乳酸3种不同pH值的浸泡液模拟人体口腔环境,将玻璃离子水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀和磷酸锌水门汀分别浸泡7 d.采取Paffenbarger重量法测定水门汀浸泡前后质量的改变,计算材料的溶解率.结果表明:玻璃离子水门汀在人工唾液、去离子水和乳酸溶液中的溶解率分别为:0.11%、0.14%、1.68%;聚羧酸锌水门汀为:0.48%、0.59%、2.80%;磷酸锌水门汀为:0.67%、1.01%、3.02%;3种水门汀溶解性大小为:玻璃离子水门汀＜聚羧酸锌水门汀＜磷酸锌水门汀.各浸泡液中,3种水门汀之间的溶解率有显著差异(P＜0.05);玻璃离子水门汀在去离子水和人工唾液中的溶解率无显著差异(P＞0.05),并保持较低的溶解率,其他2种水门汀在3种浸泡液中的溶解率都有显著差异(P＜0.05);3种水门汀在乳酸溶液中的溶解率都明显高于其他2种浸泡液中的溶解率(P＜0.05),而且磷酸锌水门汀的溶解率明显高于其他2种水门汀.3种水门汀在不同pH值下溶解性变化规律一致,浸泡液pH值对水门汀的溶解性具有明显的影响.
The artificial saliva, deionized water and lactic acid solutions with different pH were chosen to simulate human oral environment. The glass ionomer cement(GIC), zinc polycarboxylate cement(ZPCC) and zinc phosphate cement(ZPC)were soaked into three kinds of soaking solution for 7 d. Using the method of Paffenbarger, the quality of cement was determined before and after soaking. The solubility was calculated. Results indicated that: the solubility of GIC in the artificial saliva, deionized water and lactic acid solution was 0.11%, 0.14% and 1.68%; the solubility of ZPCC in three kinds of solution was 0.48%, 0.59% and 2.80%; the solubility of ZPC was 0.67%, 1.01% and 3.02%. The comparison of the solubility of three cements was: GIC
参考文献
| [1] | 陈治清.口腔材料学[M].Beijing:People's Medical Press,1999:117. |
| [2] | 陈治清;管利民.口腔粘结学[M].Beijing:Beijing Medical University/Chinese Peking Union Medical College Combined Press,1992:20. |
| [3] | 吴玮,陈吉华,赵三军,何帅.三种水门汀稳定性的比较研究[J].第四军医大学学报,2006(11):1034-1036. |
| [4] | 韩宁宁,莫三心.不同pH值的浸泡液对玻璃离子水门汀溶解性的影响[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2007(01):15-17. |
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
- 您的评分：
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%