为明确循环流化床烟气脱硫(CFB-FGD)技术在工业过程中的适用性,采用模糊综合评价法建立了烟气脱硫技术(FGD)性能的综合分析平台.该平台综合考虑了经济、环保、技术性能等多方面因素,能够提供科学、直观地分析结果.本文利用该平台对七种常见FGD技术进行了分析,基本综合评价结果表明,工业常用的海水法与石灰石-石膏湿法烟气脱硫技术的表现最佳;条件综合评价结果显示,干法CFB-FGD是缺水地区的首选.
参考文献
[1] | Ravi K. Srivastava;Wojciech Jozewicz;Carl Singer .SO_2 Scrubbing Technologies: A Review[J].Environmental Progress,2001(4):219-228. |
[2] | Jie Zhang;Suwei Zhao;Changfu You .Rapid Hydration Preparation of Calcium-Based Sorbent Made from Lime and Fly Ash[J].Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,2007(16):5340-5345. |
[3] | Yuan Li;Chenxing Song;Changfu You .Experimental Study on Abrasion Characteristics of Rapidly Hydrated Sorbent for Moderate Temperature Dry Flue Gas Desulfurization[J].Energy & Fuels,2010(Mar./Apr.):1682-1686. |
[4] | Zhang J;You CF;Chen CH;Qi HY;Xu XC .Effect of near-wall air curtain on the wall deposition of droplets in a semidry flue gas desulfurization reactor[J].Environmental Science & Technology: ES&T,2007(12):4415-4421. |
[5] | Zhang J;You CF;Zhao SW;Chen CH;Qi HY .Characteristics and reactivity of rapidly hydrated sorbent for semidry flue gas desulfurization[J].Environmental Science & Technology: ES&T,2008(5):1705-1710. |
[6] | F.B. Chaaban;T. Mezher;M. Ouwayjan .Options for emissions reduction from power plants: an economic evaluation[J].International journal of electrical power and energy systems,2004(1):57-63. |
[7] | 方德斌,王先甲,张玉新,刘坤,周晓熙.电力市场环境下发电公司投标智能决策支持系统[J].电网技术,2003(11):38-42. |
[8] | M.M. Kablan .Decision support for energy conservation promotion: an analytic hierarchy process approach[J].Energy Policy,2004(10):1151-1158. |
[9] | 马一太,王志国,杨昭,吕灿仁.燃气轮机性能评价的模糊综合评判方法[J].中国电机工程学报,2003(09):218-220. |
[10] | 陈亚非,高翔,骆仲泱,倪明江,岑可法.烟气脱硫技术的模糊综合评判法[J].中国电机工程学报,2004(02):215-220. |
[11] | Zhihong Liang;Kun Yang;Yaowei Sun;Jiahai Yuan;Hongwei Zhang;Zhizheng Zhang .Decision support for choice optimal power generation projects: Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on the electricity market[J].Energy policy,2006(17):3359-3364. |
上一张
下一张
上一张
下一张
计量
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
文章评分
- 您的评分:
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%