Crystallographic Analysis of Martensite in 0.2C-2.0Mn-1.5Si-0.6Cr Steel using EBSD

材料科学技术（英文）, 2011, 27(10): 920-930.

Crystallographic Analysis of Martensite in 0.2C-2.0Mn-1.5Si-0.6Cr Steel using EBSD

^1, , ^2, , ^3, , ^4,

1.Department of Mechanical-Engineering, University of Oulu, Box 4200, 90014 University of Oulu, Finland

2.CEA, LITEN, 17 rues des Martys, 38054, Grenoble, France

3.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, 848 Benedum Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261-2285, USA

4.Department of Mechanical-Engineering, University of Oulu, Box 4200, 90014 University of Oulu, Finland

基金项目: The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (Tekes) is gratefully acknowledged(QaMiS project;No. 1691/31/07;No. 40197/07)

关键词：马氏体板条 , 晶体学分析 , EBSD , 电子背散射衍射 , 钢 , 数据包 , 形态学 , 晶体形成

Crystallographic Analysis of Martensite in 0.2C-2.0Mn-1.5Si-0.6Cr Steel using EBSD

Keywords： Martensite , Austenite , Nishiyama-Wassermann orientation relationship , EBSD , Crystallography , Packet ,

The crystallography of martensite formed in 0.2C-2.0Mn-1,5Si-0.6Cr steel was studied using the electron backscattered diffraction （EBSD） technique. The results showed that the observed orientation relationship （OR） was closer to that of Nishiyama-Wassermann （N-W） than Kurdjumov-Sachs. The martensite consisted of parallel laths forming morphological packets. Typically, there were three different lath orientations in a morphological packet consisting of three specific N-W OR variants sharing the same {111} austenite plane. A packet of martensite laths with a common {111} austenite plane was termed a crystallographic packet. Generally, the crystallographic packet size corresponded to the morphological packet size, but occasionally the morphological packet was found to consist of two or more crystallographic packets. Therefore, the crystallographic packet size appeared to be finer than the morphological packet size. The relative orientation between the variants in crystallographic packets was found to be near 60°〈110〉, which explains the strong peak observed near 60° in the grain boundary misorientation distribution. Martensite also contained a high fraction of boundaries with a misorientation in the range 2.5-8°. Typically these boundaries were found to be located inside the martensite laths forming sub-laths.

参考文献

[1]	S. Morito;X. Huang;T. Furuhara .The morphology and crystallography of lath martensite in alloy steels[J].Acta materialia,2006(19):5323-5331.
[2]	C.P. Luo;J. Liu .Crystallography of lath martensite and lower bainite in alloy steels[J].Materials Science & Engineering, A. Structural Materials: Properties, Misrostructure and Processing,2006(0):149-152.
[3]	H. Beladi;Y. Adachi;I. Timokhina .Crystallographic analysis of nanobainitic steels[J].Scripta materialia,2009(6):455-458.
[4]	B. Sonderegger;S. Mitsche;H. Cerjak .Martensite laths in creep resistant martensitic 9-12 percent Cr steels Calculation and measurement of misorientations[J].Materials Characterization,2007(10):874-882.
[5]	L. Ryde .Application of EBSD to analysis of microstructures in commercial steels[J].Materials Science and Technology: MST: A publication of the Institute of Metals,2006(11):1297-1306.

上一张下一张

计量

下载量()
访问量()

作者相关

在本站搜索
在百度学术搜索
在万方数据库搜索
在CNKI搜索

文章评分

您的评分：
1

0%
2

0%
3

0%
4

0%
5

0%

材料期刊网

Crystallographic Analysis of Martensite in 0.2C-2.0Mn-1.5Si-0.6Cr Steel using EBSD

Crystallographic Analysis of Martensite in 0.2C-2.0Mn-1.5Si-0.6Cr Steel using EBSD

参考文献