欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

利用51B式7.62mm手枪弹对不同强度和塑性的薄钢板进行枪击试验,采用ANSYS/LS-DYNA软件对试验过程进行数值模拟,对试验和数值模拟过程的钢板破坏形貌、背凸高度、残余弹丸长度等宏观形貌进行比较。结合抗弹过程中弹丸和钢板消耗的能量,分析了强度和塑性对钢板抗弹性能的影响。结果表明:尽管两种钢板的抗拉强度和断后伸长率差异较大,但其抗51B式7.62mm手枪弹性能相当。试验和数值模拟结果吻合较好,模拟方法能够正确地反映弹丸冲击靶板过程。因较高强度钢板使弹丸变形消耗的能量大于较低强度钢板,塑性较好钢板本身变形消耗的能量大于较低塑性钢板,从而解释了两种钢板抗弹性能相当的试验结果。

51B-type 7.62mm pistol bullets were fired at thin steel plates with different strength and ductility. And the numerical simulation for the experiments was carried on by ANSYS/LS-DYNA too. The macro-appearance in the process of testing and numerical simulation were compared, such as the impact craters, bulge height and residual projectile size. At last, combined with the energy absorption of the steel plate and the bullet, the influence of the strength and ductility on ballistic performance was analyzed. The results show that: two tested steel plates almost have the same ballistic performance against the 5113 type 7.62 mm pistol bullets, although the very different tensile strength and elongation they have. The numerical simulation result is consistent with the experiment, and it can re- flect the process of the bullets impact target rightly. To the higher strength steel plate, energy absorption by making the projectile deformation is greater than the lower strength one, and to the higher ductility steel plate, energy absorption though its own deformation is larger than the lower ductility one. Thus, the result of two tested steel plates almost have the same ballistic performance is explained.

参考文献

[1] Corbett G G;Reid S R;Johnson W .Impact Loading of Plates and Shells by Free-Flying Projeetiles:A Review[J].International Journal of Impact Engineering,1996,18(02):141.
[2] Baekmank Marvin E;Goldsmith Werner .The Mechanics of Penetration of Projectiles Into Targets[J].International Journal of Engineering Science,1978,16(01):1.
[3] 董瀚;李桂芬;陈南平 .高强度钢中绝热剪切带的组织和硬度[J].金属学报,1996,32(06):599.
[4] 时捷,董瀚,王琪,刘燕林.硬度对装甲钢板抗弹性能的影响[J].钢铁研究学报,2000(03):36-41.
[5] 李晓源,时捷,董瀚.不同强度的40CrNi2Mo钢抗弹性能研究[J].兵器材料科学与工程,2008(01):14-18.
[6] Borvik T;Hopperstad O S;Berstad T et al.A Computa- tional Model of Viscoplasticity and Ductile Damage for Impact and Penetration[J].European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids,2001,20:685.
[7] Dey S;Borvik T;Hopperstad O S et al.The Effect of Tar- get Strength on the Perforation of Steel Plates Using Three Different Projectile Nose Shapes[J].International Journal ofImpact Engineering,2004,30:1005.
[8] Borvik T;Dey S;Clausen A It .Perforation Resistance of Five Different High-Strength Steel Plates Subjected to Small- Arms Projectiles[J].International Journal of Impact Engi- neering,2009,36:948.
[9] Borvik Tore;Clausen Arild H;Eriksson Magnus et al.Ex- perimental and Numerical Study on the Perforation of AA6005-T6 Panels[J].International Journal of Impact Engi- neering,2005,32:35.
[10] Borvik T.;Berstad T.;Langseth M.;Hopperstad OS. .Numerical simulation of plugging failure in ballistic penetration[J].International Journal of Solids and Structures,2001(34/35):6241-6264.
[11] <枪弹手册>编写组.枪弹手册[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1988:2.
[12] <步兵自动武器及弹药设计手册>编写组.步兵自动武器及弹药设计手册:上册[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1977:182.
[13] 胡昌明,贺红亮,胡时胜.D6AC钢的动态力学性能研究[J].兵器材料科学与工程,2003(02):26-29.
[14] 吕剑,何颖波,田常津,张方举,陈成军,邓宏见.泰勒杆实验对材料动态本构参数的确认和优化确定[J].爆炸与冲击,2006(04):339-344.
[15] Johnson Gordon R;Cook Willian H .Fracture Characteristics of Three Metals Subjected to Various Strains,Strain Rates,Temperatures and Pressures[J].Engineering Fracture Me- chanics,1985,21(01):31.
[16] Johnson Gordon R;Cook Willian H.A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strain,High Strain Rates and High Temperatures[A].Netherlands:Hague,1983:541.
[17] 陈蓉,时捷,董瀚,刘燕林,顾玉丽,荣凡.含氮奥氏体钢与马氏体钢的抗弹行为研究[J].兵器材料科学与工程,2006(02):46-51.
[18] 董瀚;李桂芬;陈南平 .高强度装甲钢的抗弹性能研究[J].钢铁,1996,31(增刊):67.
[19] 蒋志刚,曾首义,周建平.刚性尖头弹侵彻贯穿金属薄靶板耗能分析[J].兵工学报,2004(06):777-781.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%