以铝基复合材料作为列车制动盘材料的实用化为目的,选用A356/SiC 20%(体积分数,下同)复合材料和AISI D2工具钢为摩擦材料,以中速列车实用中的有机闸片为对偶材料,进行对比干摩擦磨损试验,并分析比较了磨损特性.结果表明:铝基复合材料在小于200 N(3.98 MPa)的低载荷下,只存在轻微的氧化磨损,耐磨性比实用中的铁合金材料更好;而超过该载荷时,开始发生磨削磨损,磨损量逐步超过铁合金材料,当载荷达到400 N(7.96 MPa)时,由于严重的磨削磨损,磨损量剧增.而铁合金材料则随载荷和滑动速度增加,磨损率缓慢增加;磨损过程中的复合材料的摩擦系数平均值与载荷、滑动速度无关,始终保持0.3～0.4,同时随磨损距离的波动也非常小,而工具钢的摩擦系数平均值则对试验参数的敏感度相对大些,且摩擦系数平均值也比复合材料略小,即摩擦系数方面复合材料具有更好的特性.
参考文献
| [1] | Li Heping;Lin Huting .[J].China Railway Science,2003,24(02):8. |
| [2] | Wu Yunxing.[J].Locomotive & Rolling Stock Technology,1996(02):1. |
| [3] | Qi Haibo;Fan Yunchang;Ji Fengqiu .[J].Journal of Shijiazhuang Railway Institute,2001,14(01):52. |
| [4] | Huang Nan;Liu Shikai.[J].Rolling Stock,1993(09):29. |
| [5] | Zhn Longju;Chen Xihong;Qi Bin et al.[J].Electric Locomotives & Mass Transit Vehicles,2006,29(01):1. |
| [6] | Hiroake N;Kenjie K;AkinoriN .[J].JSAE Review,2002,23:365. |
| [7] | Thomas Zeumer.[J].Locomotive & Rolling Stock Technology,1999(02):19. |
| [8] | Howell G J;Ball A .[J].Wear,1995,181-184:279. |
| [9] | Grigoris E. Kiourtsidis;Stefanos M. Skolianos .Wear behavior of artificially aged AA2024/40 μm SiC{sub}p composites in comparison with conventionally wear resistant ferrous materials[J].Wear: an International Journal on the Science and Technology of Friction, Lubrication and Wear,2002(9/10):946-956. |
| [10] | Garcia Cordovilla C;Narciso J;Louis E .[J].Wear,1996,192:170. |
| [11] | Manchang Gui;Suk Bong Kang;Jungmoo Lee .[J].Materials Science and Engineering,2000,A293:146. |
| [12] | Jin Yunxue;Jung-Moo Lee;Suk Bong Kang .Dry Sliding Wear Properties of A356/SiCp Composites Against Organic Pad[J].Journal of Korean Institute of Metal and Materials,2007(4):258-267. |
上一张
下一张
上一张
下一张
计量
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
文章评分
- 您的评分：
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%