欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

通过六个典型流动换热问题对CLEAR、SIMPLE、SIMPLEC和SIMPLER四种算法进行收敛性和健壮性比较.在相同的数值处理方法下,收敛所用CPU时间多少用来判断算法的收敛特性;能得到收敛解的时步倍率范围大小用来比较算法的健壮性.比较结果表明,对于开口系统SIMPLEC算法综合效果较好,而闭口系统CLEAR算法综合占优.

参考文献

[1] Patankar S V;Spalding D B .A Calculation Procedure for Heat,Mass and Momentum Transfer in ThreeDimensional Parabolic Flows[J].Int J of and Mass Transfer,1972,15:1787-1806.
[2] 陶文铨.数值传热学[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2001:203-207.
[3] 陶文铨.计算传热学的近代进展[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:159-161.
[4] Patankar S V.Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow[M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1980
[5] Patankar S V .A Calculation Procedure for Two-Dimensional Elliptic Situations[J].Numerical Heat Transfer,1981,4:409-425.
[6] Van Doormaal J P;Raithy G D .Enhancements of the SIMPLE Method for Predicting Incompressible Fluid Flows[J].Numerical Heat Transfer,1984,7:147-163.
[7] Tao WQ;Qu ZG;He YL .A novel segregated algorithm for incompressible fluid flow and heat transfer problems - Clear (coupled and linked equations algorithm revised) part I: Mathematical formulation and solution procedure[J].Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B. Fundamentals: An International Journal of Computation and Methodology,2004(1):1-17.
[8] Tao WQ;Qu ZG;He YL .A novel segregated algorithm for incompressible fluid flow and heat transfer problems - Clear (coupled and linked equations algorithm revised) part II: Application examples[J].Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B. Fundamentals: An International Journal of Computation and Methodology,2004(1):19-48.
[9] Van Doormanl J P;Raithy G D.An Evaluation of the Segregated Approach for Predicting Incompressible Fluid Flows[A].Denver,Colorado,1985
[10] Moulalled F;Darwish M .A Unified Formulation of the Staggered Class of Algorithms for Fluid Flow at All Speeds[J].Numerical Heat Transfer,Part B,2000,37:103-139.
[11] 曾敏,陶文铨.密网格下SIMPLE等四种算法的收敛性与健壮性的比较[J].热科学与技术,2003(01):90-93.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%