欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

采用球压痕试验和常规拉伸试验两种方法对16MnR钢的拉伸性能进行了测试并进行了对比.结果表明:球压痕法能够准确、基本无损地测出试验钢的拉伸性能,其结果与常规拉伸试验结果比较符合,屈服强度和抗拉强度的最大误差分别为6.8%和1.9%.

参考文献

[1] TABOR D.The hardness of metals[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1951
[2] HAGGAG F M.In-situ measurements of mechanical properties using novel automated ball indentation system[A].Philadelphia:American Society for Testing and Materials,1993:27-44.
[3] HAGGAG F M;WANG J A;THEISS T J.Using portable/ in-situ stress-strain microprobe system to measure mechanical properties of steel bridges during service[A].Scottsdale:International Society for Optics and Photonics,1996:65-75.
[4] MIRAGLIA P Q;MATHEW M D;MURTY K L.Nondestructive evaluation of mechanical properties of A533B steel qeld using automated ball indentation testing[A].,1998:835-841.
[5] Sabita Ghosh;S. K. Sahay;Goutam Das .BALL INDENTATION TECHNIQUE -- AN IMPORTANT AND USEFUL METHOD FOR STUDYING THE FLOW PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS[J].Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals,2004(1):51-60.
[6] JAE-IL JANG;YEOL CHOI;JUNG-SUK LEE .Application of instrumented indentation technique for enhanced fitness-for-service assessment of pipeline crack[J].International Journal of Fracture,2005(1):15-34.
[7] 伍声宝,关凯书.球压痕法评价材料拉伸性能的有限元分析[J].压力容器,2012(09):33-38,49.
[8] OLIVER W C;PHARR G M .Improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments[J].Journal of Materials Research,1992,7(06):1564-1583.
[9] DIETER G E.Mechanical Metallurgy[M].New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company,Inc,1986:289-292.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%