欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

采用振荡平衡法、土壤薄层层析法和土柱淋溶法研究了噻虫嗪在砂土、粉砂壤土和砂姜黑土等3种不同理化性质土壤中的吸附和淋溶特性,探讨了农药的吸附与淋溶特性与土壤理化性质的关系以及剂型对农药淋溶特性的影响.结果表明,噻虫嗪在3种土壤中的吸附较好地符合Freundlich方程,Kd值分别为砂土1.25、粉砂壤土2.95、砂姜黑土5.10,其大小顺序与Koc值一致.黏粒含量是影响噻虫嗪在土壤中吸附性的最主要因素,有机质含量为次要因素.土壤薄层层析实验和土柱淋溶实验均表明噻虫嗪在3种土壤中的淋溶速率顺序为砂土>粉砂壤土>砂姜黑土,且油悬浮剂、水悬浮剂淋溶量较高,水分散粒剂次之,颗粒剂最低.噻虫嗪存在对地下水污染的潜在风险,特别是在黏粒和有机质含量低的环境下使用时,其风险应该引起足够的重视.

To study the influence of soil basic physical and chemical properties on the adsorption and leaching behavior of pesticides in soil, the adsorption and leaching of thiamethoxam onto three different soils including Sandy soil, Silt loam soil, Shajiang black soil, were conducted by oscillation equilibrium experiment, soil thin layer chromatography and column leaching. The results showed that the adsorption of thiamethoxam in the soils could be well fitted by the empirical Freundich isotherm. The adsorption constants ( Kd ) were 1. 25, 2. 95 and 5. 10 in Sandy soil, Silt loam soil, Shajiang black soil, respectively. Clay content was the dominant factor affecting the adsorption of terbufos in soils, and the soil organic matter content was the next factor. The leaching of thiamethoxam was in the order of Sandy soil>Silt loam soil>Shajiang black soil. Higher amount of oil suspended agent and water suspended agent leached out, followed by water dispersible granule, and the granulehad the lowest amount of leaching. These results demonstrated that thiamethoxam has potential risk of contaminating groundwater. Attention should be paid to its application, particularly in the soil of low clay content and organic matter content.

参考文献

[1] 张庆臣,薛明,王征,张云霞,李贤贤.新烟碱类等杀虫剂对葱蝇的毒力及其对生长发育和繁殖的影响[J].植物保护学报,2011(02):159-165.
[2] 张鹏,陈澄宇,李慧,刘峰,慕卫.七种新烟碱类杀虫剂对韭菜迟眼蕈蚊幼虫及蚯蚓的选择毒力[J].植物保护学报,2014(01):79-86.
[3] 郭建国,张海英,刘永刚,吕和平,郭文超.新烟碱类杀虫剂拌种对马铃薯甲虫幼虫食物利用和生长发育的影响[J].昆虫学报,2010(07):748-753.
[4] Steven J.Castle;Frank J.Byrne;Jial L Bi;Nick C.Toscano .Spatial and temporal distribution of imidacloprid and thiamethoxam in citrus and impact on Homalodisca coagulata populations[J].Pest Management Science,2005(1):75-84.
[5] 唐振华;毕强.杀虫剂作用的分子行为[M].上海:上海远东出版社,2003
[6] Ting Xu;Ke-Yi Wei;Jia Wang;Hui-Xin Ma;Ji Li;Yan-Jun Xu;Qing X. Li .Quantitative analysis of the neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid and thiamethoxam in fruit juices by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.[J].Journal of AOAC International,2010(1):12-18.
[7] 张瑾,闫书军.农药在土壤中淋溶迁移影响因素研究进展[J].安徽建筑工业学院学报(自然科学版),2008(04):38-45.
[8] 王晓峰,王晓燕.国外降雨径流污染过程及控制管理研究进展[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002(01):91-96,101.
[9] 郑立庆,刘国光,孙德智.新型农药噻虫嗪的水解与光解研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2006(06):1005-1008.
[10] 刘长令;李明国;张国生.世界农药大全(杀虫剂卷)[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2012:235-236.
[11] 国家环境保护总局.化学农药环境安全评价试验准则[M].北京:国家环境保护总局,2003
[12] 贺敏,贾春虹,马志宏,王守现,刘宇,王纪华.土壤中噻虫嗪和氯虫苯甲酰胺的残留分析方法[J].农药,2013(06):431-433.
[13] 孔德洋,许静,韩志华,何健,石利利,单正军.七种农药在3种不同类型土壤中的吸附及淋溶特性[J].农药学学报,2012(05):545-550.
[14] 张伟,王进军,张忠明,秦蓁.烟嘧磺隆在土壤中的吸附及与土壤性质的相关性研究[J].农药学学报,2006(03):265-271.
[15] 王琪全,刘维屏.除草剂灭草烟在土壤中的吸附、脱附[J].中国环境科学,1998(04):314-318.
[16] 李克斌,刘广深,刘维屏.酰胺类除草剂在土壤上吸附的位置能量分布分析[J].土壤学报,2003(04):574-580.
[17] 郑麟,王福钧.14C-氟乐灵在土壤中的迁移和降解[J].核农学报,1993(01):37-44.
[18] 徐瑞薇;胡钦红;靳伟 等.多效唑在土壤中降解,吸附和淋溶作用[J].环境化学,1994,11(3):1-4.
[19] 吴文铸,郭敏,孔德洋,石利利,许静,单正军.噻虫胺在土壤中的吸附和淋溶特性[J].环境化学,2012(11):1730-1735.
[20] 何利文,石利利,孔德洋,单正军,宗良纲.呋喃丹和阿特拉津在土柱中的淋溶及其影响因素[J].生态与农村环境学报,2006(02):71-74.
[21] Petrovic A M;Larsson-Kovach I .Effect of maturing turfgrass soils on the leaching of the herbicide mecoprop[J].Chemosphere,1996,33(4):585-593.
[22] Hance R J.Adsorption of glyphosate by soils[J].Pesticide science,1976(7):363-366.
[23] 乔雄梧.农药在土壤中的环境行为[J].农药科学与管理,1999(增刊):12-20.
[24] 宋文吕,徐小清.阳离子表面活性剂十六烷基三甲基溴化铵对酞酸酯类化合物增溶性研究[J].环境化学,2001(04):344-350.
[25] Haigh SD. .A REVIEW OF THE INTERACTION OF SURFACTANTS WITH ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS IN SOIL[J].Science of the Total Environment,1996(1/3):161-170.
[26] Sanchez-Camazano M.;Rodriguez-Cruz MS.;Sanchez-Martin MJ. .Sodium dodecyl sulphate-enhanced desorption of atrazine: Effect of surfactant concentration and of organic matter content of soils[J].Chemosphere,2000(8):1301-1305.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%