外加应力使贝氏体相变形核率增大,等温孕育期缩短,即使所加应力远低于母相的屈服强度.由于钢中γ→α+γ'的形核驱动力较大(约为kJ/mol数量级),贝氏体相变的膨胀应变能很小,过小的外加应力对形核率的影响甚微.考虑在外加应力的影响下,会使界面能量有所下降,也可能发生碳原子的再分布,偏聚在晶界或其它缺陷,甚至碳化物析出都会显著地增大形核率和缩短孕育期,有侍进一步实验给予证明无应力下,贝氏体相变动力学可以用Avrami的等温相变方程来表述;应力下则符合应力下铁索体及珠光体相变的动力学模型(经修改的Avrami方程).形变奥氏体促发贝氏体相变,但随后会发生奥氏体的力学稳定化,其机制可能和马氏体相变时的奥氏体力学稳定化不完全相同,仅形变形成的位错阻碍贝氏体以一定位向长大,使相变动力学迟缓.贝氏体相变时奥氏体力学稳定化的模型有待建立.
参考文献
[1] | Denis S, Gautier E, Simon A, Beck G. Mater Sci Technol,1985; 1:805 |
[2] | Duckworth W E. J Met, 1966; 18:915 |
[3] | Guarnieri G J, Kanter J J. Trans ASM, 1948; 40:1147 |
[4] | Howard R T, Cohen M. Trans AIME, 1948; 176:384 |
[5] | Radcliffe S V, Rollason E C. J Iron Steel Inst, London,1959; 191:56 |
[6] | Goodenow R H, Barkalow R H, Hehemann R F. Iron Steel Inst Spec Rep No.95, London, 1969:135 |
[7] | Ericsson C E, Bhat M S, Parker E R, Zackay V F. Metall Trans, 1976; 7A: 1800 |
[8] | Ko T. J Iron Steel Inst, London, 1953; 175:16 |
[9] | Hawkins M J, Barford J. J Iron Steel Inst, London, 1972;210:97 |
[10] | Cottrell A H. J Iron Steel Inst, London, 1945; 151:93 |
[11] | Jepson M D, Thompson F C. J Iron Steel Inst, London,1949; 162:49 |
[12] | Porter L E, Rosenthal P C. Acta Metall, 1959; 7:504 |
[13] | Radcliffe S V, Schatz M, Kulin S A. J Iron Steel Inst,London, 1963; 201:143 |
[14] | Nilan T G. TMS AIME, 1967; 239:898 |
[15] | Drozdov B Y, Kogan L I, Entin R I. Phys Met Metallogr,1962; 13:135 |
[16] | Umemoto M, Bando S, Tamura I. In: Tamura I et al eds.,Proc Int Conf Martensitic Transformations 1986, Sendai,Japan: The Jpn Inst Met, 1987:595 |
[17] | BhadeshiaH K D H, David S A, Vitek J M, Read RW.Mater Sci Technol, 1991; 7:686 |
[18] | Matsuzaki A, Bhadeshia H K D H, Harade H. Acta Metall Mater, 1994; 42:1081 |
[19] | Shipway P H, Bhadeshia H K D H. Mater Sci Eng, 1995;A201:143 |
[20] | Freiwillig R, Kudrman J, Chráska P. Metall Trans, 1976;7A: 1091 |
[21] | Olson G B, Cohen M. Metall Trans, 1976; 7A: 1897, 1905,1915 |
[22] | Xu Z Y (Hsu T Y). Martensitic Transformation and Martensite. 2nd ed., Beijing: Science Press, 1999: 593,700(徐祖耀.马氏体相变与马氏体.第2版,北京:科学出版社,1999:593,700) |
[23] | Bhadeshia H K D H. Mater Sci Eng, 1999; A273-275:58 |
[24] | Bhadeshia H K D H. Bainite in Steels. 2nd ed., Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press, 2001:207 |
[25] | Tsuzaki K, Ueda T, Fujiwara K, Maki T. In: Igata N,Kimpara I, Kishi T, Nakata E, Okura A, Uryn T, eds.,New Materials and Processes for the Future, Proc 1st Japan Int SAMPE Symp and Exhibition, Chiba, Japan:Society for the Advancement of Materials and Process Engineering, 1989:799 |
[26] | Singh S B, Bhadeshia H K D H. Mater Sci Technol, 1996;12:610 |
[27] | Yang J R, Huang C Y, Hsiech W H, Chiou C S. Mater Trans JIM, 1996; 37:579 |
[28] | Larn R H, Yang J R. Mater Sci Eng, 2000; A278:278 |
[29] | Lange W F Ⅲ, Enomoto M, Aaronson H I. Metall Trans,1988; 19A: 427 |
[30] | Hsu T Y (Xu Z Y), Mou Y W. Acta Metall, 1984; 32:1469 |
[31] | Brandes E A. Smithells Metals Reference Book. London:Butterworths, 1983:15-2 |
[32] | Grujicic M, Zhou X W. CALPHAD, 1993; 17:383 |
[33] | Feder J, Russell K C, Lothe J, Pound G M. Adv Phys,1966; 15:111 |
[34] | Gao N, Liu Z, Yu Y P. Trans Mater Heat Treat, 2001;22(3): 1(高宁,刘庄,余永平.材料热处理学报,2001;.22(3):1) |
[35] | Ye J S.PhD Thesis,Shanghai Jiaotong University,2003(叶健松.上海交通大学博士学位论文,2003) |
[36] | Hsu T Y (Xu Z Y), Chen W Z. Scr Metall, 1987; 21:1289 |
上一张
下一张
上一张
下一张
计量
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
文章评分
- 您的评分:
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%