研究了NaOH, KOH, Mg(OH)2, Ba(OH)2和CaO等5碱促进剂在Ru/CNFs催化山梨醇氢解过程中的作用机制。结果表明,这些碱均能显著提高山梨醇的转化率,但生成二元醇的选择性随碱种类而有所差异,其中以CaO促进的催化剂二元醇选择性最高。 CaO提供了用以催化C-C键断裂的OH-,同时与中间产物形成络合物从而影响反应历程。提出了CaO作为促进剂时山梨醇氢解生成二元醇的反应历程,并由此进一步优化了山梨醇浓度、Ru催化剂用量和碱促进剂用量之间的匹配以达到更高的二元醇产率。
Sorbitol hydrogenolysis over carbon nanofibers-supported Ru (Ru/CNFs) was carried out with different bases (NaOH, KOH, Mg(OH)2, Ba(OH)2, and CaO) to investigate the role of base promoter. The results indicated that all the bases used significantly enhanced the sorbitol conversion while the glycol selectivities varied with the base type and amount. CaO was the best base in terms of glycol selectivity for two reasons. CaO provided OH-for the base-promoted cleavage of C-C bonds, while it also supplied Ca2+ for complexation with the intermediate aldehydes, thus affecting the reaction pathways. We identified an optimum ratio among sorbitol concentration, Ru/CNFs catalyst, and CaO to achieve favorable glycol selectivities in sorbitol hydrogenolysis. Reaction pathways for sorbitol hydrogenolysis into glycols in aqueous solution in the presence of CaO have been proposed based on the mechanistic study.
参考文献
| [1] | Chheda J N;Huber G W;Dumesic J A .[J].ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION,2007,46:7164. |
| [2] | Ruppert A M;Weinberg K;Palkovits R .[J].ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION,2012,51:2564. |
| [3] | ChenX G;Wang X C;Yao S X;Mu X D .[J].CATALYSIS COMMUNICATIONS,2013,39:86. |
| [4] | Zartman W H;Adkins H .[J].Journal of the American Chemical Society,1933,55:4559. |
| [5] | Clark I T .[J].Industrial and Engineering Chemistry,1958,50:1125. |
| [6] | Casale B;Marini L .[P].EP Patent 510 238,1992. |
| [7] | Chao J C;Huibers D T A .[P].US Patent 4 366 332,1982. |
| [8] | Chopade S P;Miller D J;Jackson J E;Werpy T A,Frye J G,Zacher A H .[P].US Patent 6 291 725,2001. |
| [9] | Dubeck M;Knapp G G .[P].US Patent 4 476 331,1984. |
| [10] | Gubitosa G;Casale B .[P].US Patent 5 600 028,1997. |
| [11] | Tanikella M S R .[P].EP Patent 0 072 629,1983. |
| [12] | Banu M;Sivasanker S;Sankaranarayanan T M;Venuvanalingam P .[J].CATALYSIS COMMUNICATIONS,2011,12:673. |
| [13] | Banu M;Venuvanalingam P;Shanmugam R;Viswanathan B Si-vasanker S .[J].Topics in Catalysis,2012,55:897. |
| [14] | Sohounloue D K;Montassier C;Barbier J .[J].Reaction Kinetics & Catalysis Letters,1983,22:391. |
| [15] | Montassier C;Ménézo J C;Hoang L C;Renaud H C Barbier J .[J].Journal of Molecular Catalysis,1991,70:99. |
| [16] | Wang K;Hawley M C;Furney T D .[J].Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,1995,34:3766. |
| [17] | Zhao, L.;Zhou, J.H.;Sui, Z.J.;Zhou, X.G. .Hydrogenolysis of sorbitol to glycols over carbon nanofiber supported ruthenium catalyst[J].Chemical Engineering Science,2010(1):30-35. |
| [18] | Zhou J H;Zhang M G;Zhao L;Li P Zhou X G Yuan W K .[J].Catalysis Today,2009,147S:S225. |
| [19] | Zhao L;Zhou J H;Yang G;Ji Y Zhang M G Chen H Zhou X G .[J].Energy Sources Part A,2012,34:430. |
| [20] | Zhao L;Zhou J H;Chen H;Zhang M G Sui Z J Zhou X G .[J].Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,2010,27:1412. |
| [21] | Feng J;Wang J B;Zhou Y F;Fun H Y Chen H Li X J .[J].CHEMISTRY LETTERS,2007,36:1274. |
| [22] | Maris E P;Davis R J .[J].Journal of Catalysis,2007,249:328. |
| [23] | Yuan Z L;Wu P;Gao J;Lu X Y Hou Z Y Zheng X M .[J].Catalysis Letters,2009,130:261. |
| [24] | Sun J Y;Liu H C .[J].Green Chemistry,2011,13:135. |
| [25] | Rass H A;Essayem N;Besson M .[J].Green Chemistry,2013,15:2240. |
| [26] | Andrews M A;Klaeren S A .[J].Journal of the American Chemical Society,1989,111:4131. |
| [27] | Kenner J;Richards G N.[J].Journal of the Chemical Society,1957:3019. |
| [28] | Sowden J C;Pohlen E K .[J].Journal of the American Chemical Society,1958,80:242. |
| [29] | 赵龙 .[D].上海:华东理工大学,2010. |
| [30] | Haslam R T;Calingaert G;Taylor C M.Solubilities of Inorganic and Organic Compounds.Volume 1[M].Part one,Pergamon Press,1963:243. |
| [31] | Lahr D G;Shanks B H .[J].Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,2003,42:5467. |
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
- 您的评分：
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%